Solar Panel Degradation: How Much Power Will You Really Have in 25 Years?
Panels lose output every year. Here's the real degradation math, what the warranties actually promise, and how it changes your savings projection.
Every solar proposal projects decades of savings — but panels don't produce the same amount forever. They degrade. Understanding the real numbers protects you from both over-optimistic sales projections AND needless worry.
## What degradation actually is
Solar panels slowly lose output as the photovoltaic material ages from UV exposure and heat cycling. It's gradual, predictable, and far slower than most people fear.
## The real numbers
- **Year 1:** panels typically drop ~1-2% (initial "light-induced degradation," then it stabilizes) - **Years 2-25:** roughly **0.4-0.55% per year** for quality Tier-1 panels - **At year 25:** a good panel still produces **86-92%** of its original rating
So a 410W panel producing 410W today produces roughly 360-377W at year 25. You lose output, but you keep the large majority of it.
## What the warranty actually promises
This is where panel brands differ and where it matters:
| Brand | 25-yr power warranty (min output at yr 25) | |---|---| | REC Alpha | 92% | | QCells Q.Peak | 86% | | Silfab | 86% | | Trina Vertex | 87% | | Generic Tier 2 | often 80% or unstated |
A "linear power warranty" guarantees the panel will produce at least X% of rated output at year 25, declining on a straight line. REC's 92% is industry-leading; the 86-87% of QCells/Silfab/Trina is standard and perfectly fine.
**Avoid panels with an 80% (or unstated) warranty** — that's a tell for lower-tier equipment.
## How it changes your savings math
Here's the honest part most proposals gloss over: their "25-year savings" number should account for degradation, but many use year-1 production for all 25 years, overstating savings.
Realistic adjustment: over 25 years, average production is roughly **93% of year-1** (because you're declining linearly from 100% to ~87%). So if a proposal claims $94,000 in lifetime savings using flat year-1 output, the degradation-adjusted figure is closer to $87,000. Still excellent — just not the inflated headline.
## What degradation does NOT mean
- **It doesn't mean panels "die" at 25 years.** They keep producing well past 25 — just below the warranty floor. Many 1990s panels are still running at 80%+ today. - **It's not sudden.** No cliff. It's a slow, linear glide. - **Inverters fail before panels do.** Your microinverters/optimizer (10-25 yr warranty) or string inverter (10-12 yr) will likely need replacement once during the system's life — budget ~$1,500-$3,000 for that, NOT panel replacement.
## The questions to ask
1. "What's the exact panel model and its 25-year power warranty percentage?" 2. "Does your savings projection account for annual degradation, or use flat year-1 output?" 3. "What's the inverter warranty, and what does replacement cost around year 12?"
## Bottom line
Quality panels lose ~0.5%/year and still produce ~87-92% at year 25 — degradation is real but mild. The bigger risks to your savings math are (a) inflated proposals using flat production, and (b) low-tier panels with weak warranties. Get the exact model + warranty %, and adjust any "lifetime savings" claim down ~7% for honest degradation.
Want me to sanity-check a proposal's production + degradation assumptions? Send it over. [reviewingsolar.com/upload](https://reviewingsolar.com/upload).